Govt. of Gujarat vs naranbhai rajabhai bambhaniya Advocate - V D KAMLIYA — 1174/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS050016392025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1174/2025

Filing Date

08-12-2025

Registration No

1174/2025

Registration Date

08-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

03rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

905

Police Station

SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

Govt. of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

naranbhai rajabhai bambhaniya Advocate - V D KAMLIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

03-04-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

12-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

03-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The Sutrapur First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted accused Naranbhai Rajabhai Bambhaniya of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A), for allegedly possessing 3 liters of illegal alcohol on October 24, 2025. The court found reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case, noting that the panchas (witnesses) did not adequately corroborate the seizure, and there was insufficient technical evidence and proper identification of the seized contraband material linking it directly to the accused, citing precedent from the Gujarat High Court that conviction requires concrete evidence establishing the link between the accused and prohibited articles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sutrapur First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted accused Naranbhai Rajabhai Bambhaniya of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(A), for allegedly possessing 3 liters of illegal alcohol on October 24, 2025. The court found reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case, noting that the panchas (witnesses) did not adequately corroborate the seizure, and there was insufficient technical evidence and proper identification of the seized contraband material linking it directly to the accused, citing precedent from the Gujarat High Court that conviction requires concrete evidence establishing the link between the accused and prohibited articles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case