Govt. of Gujarat vs jetha jesing gohil Advocate - V D KAMLIYA — 1173/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS050016382025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1173/2025

Filing Date

08-12-2025

Registration No

1173/2025

Registration Date

08-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

03rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

785

Police Station

SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

Govt. of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

jetha jesing gohil Advocate - V D KAMLIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

03-04-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

12-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

03-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Sutrapar Judicial Magistrate Court (Gujarat) acquitted Jethabhai Jetsingham Gohil of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(a), finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical deficiencies: witnesses (panchas) did not support the prosecution narrative, only police officers testified as witnesses despite the seizure occurring in a public area where civilian witnesses should have been present, and the evidence lacked proper corroboration regarding the quality and origin of the seized alcohol. Applying Supreme Court precedent, the court ruled that when conviction prospects are dim, the court should not waste time completing trial formalities, and granted the accused the benefit of reasonable doubt, ordering his acquittal and destruction of seized materials after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sutrapar Judicial Magistrate Court (Gujarat) acquitted Jethabhai Jetsingham Gohil of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(a), finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical deficiencies: witnesses (panchas) did not support the prosecution narrative, only police officers testified as witnesses despite the seizure occurring in a public area where civilian witnesses should have been present, and the evidence lacked proper corroboration regarding the quality and origin of the seized alcohol. Applying Supreme Court precedent, the court ruled that when conviction prospects are dim, the court should not waste time completing trial formalities, and granted the accused the benefit of reasonable doubt, ordering his acquittal and destruction of seized materials after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case