Govt. of Gujarat vs jiviben mandabhai solanki Advocate - V D KAMLIYA — 1172/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS050016372025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1172/2025
Filing Date
08-12-2025
Registration No
1172/2025
Registration Date
08-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
975
Police Station
SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govt. of Gujarat
Respondent(s)
jiviben mandabhai solanki Advocate - V D KAMLIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 12-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Sutrapad First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused, Jiviben (w/o Mandabhai Palabhai Solanki), under Section 65(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act on March 16, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the panchas (witnesses) did not corroborate the seizure properly, and the police investigation had procedural deficiencies. The court benefited the accused with the doubt and discharged her as not guilty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Sutrapad First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused, Jiviben (w/o Mandabhai Palabhai Solanki), under Section 65(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act on March 16, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the panchas (witnesses) did not corroborate the seizure properly, and the police investigation had procedural deficiencies. The court benefited the accused with the doubt and discharged her as not guilty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts