Govt. of Gujarat vs hareshabhai urfe rajeshabhai lakhabhai vaja Advocate - V D KAMLIYA — 1171/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS050016362025

Filing Number

1171/2025

Filing Date

08-Dec-2025

Registration No

1171/2025

Registration Date

08-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

929

Police Station

SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Govt. of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.hareshabhai urfe rajeshabhai lakhabhai vaja Advocate - V D KAMLIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary The Sutrapad First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted accused Haresh (Rajshbhai Lakhabhai Wala) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A) on March 16, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, noting that the panchas (witnesses) did not corroborate the seizure of illicit alcohol, proper evidence regarding quantity and quality was absent, and no direct link connecting the prohibited articles to the accused was established. The court granted the accused the benefit of doubt as per criminal jurisprudence principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 12-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 08-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1171/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Sutrapad First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted accused Haresh (Rajshbhai Lakhabhai Wala) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A) on March 16, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, noting that the panchas (witnesses) did not corroborate the seizure of illicit alcohol, proper evidence regarding quantity and quality was absent, and no direct link connecting the prohibited articles to the accused was established. The court granted the accused the benefit of doubt as per criminal jurisprudence principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case