Govt. of Gujarat vs vijaybhai masaribhai vaja Advocate - M R RATHOD — 1170/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS050016352025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1170/2025
Filing Date
08-12-2025
Registration No
1170/2025
Registration Date
08-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
154
Police Station
SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govt. of Gujarat
Respondent(s)
vijaybhai masaribhai vaja Advocate - M R RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 12-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sutrapadha Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted accused Vijayabhai Masribhai Raja of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A) for illegally possessing four liters of alcohol. The court found that while prosecution witnesses (panchas) were examined, they failed to corroborate the prosecution case, and the investigation procedure was compromised by lack of proper technical evidence (FSL report) and failure to establish direct connection of the prohibited articles with the accused. Applying the principle of "benefit of doubt" and relying on Supreme Court precedents, the court held the case not proven beyond reasonable doubt and acquitted the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Sutrapadha Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted accused Vijayabhai Masribhai Raja of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A) for illegally possessing four liters of alcohol. The court found that while prosecution witnesses (panchas) were examined, they failed to corroborate the prosecution case, and the investigation procedure was compromised by lack of proper technical evidence (FSL report) and failure to establish direct connection of the prohibited articles with the accused. Applying the principle of "benefit of doubt" and relying on Supreme Court precedents, the court held the case not proven beyond reasonable doubt and acquitted the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts