Govt. of Gujarat vs jiviben w o mandabhai palabhai solanki Advocate - V D KAMLIYA — 1166/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS050016312025
Filing Number
1166/2025
Filing Date
08-Dec-2025
Registration No
1166/2025
Registration Date
08-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
877
Police Station
SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Govt. of Gujarat
Respondent(s)
-
1.jiviben w o mandabhai palabhai solanki Advocate - V D KAMLIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Sutrapur Judicial Magistrate (First Class) Court acquitted the accused, Jiviben (daughter of Mandabhai Palabhai Solanki), of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A) for allegedly possessing 2 liters of illegal alcohol on October 16, 2015. The court found reasonable doubts in the prosecution's case, particularly noting that the panch witnesses (mandatory witnesses) did not adequately corroborate the seizure details, proper technical evidence was absent, and the investigation appeared flawed, making it impossible to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The accused was acquitted and released, with seized contraband to be destroyed after appeal periods expire. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1166/2025
Summary The Sutrapur Judicial Magistrate (First Class) Court acquitted the accused, Jiviben (daughter of Mandabhai Palabhai Solanki), of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A) for allegedly possessing 2 liters of illegal alcohol on October 16, 2015. The court found reasonable doubts in the prosecution's case, particularly noting that the panch witnesses (mandatory witnesses) did not adequately corroborate the seizure details, proper technical evidence was absent, and the investigation appeared flawed, making it impossible to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The accused was acquitted and released, with seized contraband to be destroyed after appeal periods expire. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts