Govt. of Gujarat vs saramanbhai babubhai kamaliya Advocate - V D KAMLIYA — 1165/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS050016302025

Filing Number

1165/2025

Filing Date

08-Dec-2025

Registration No

1165/2025

Registration Date

08-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

855

Police Station

SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Govt. of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.saramanbhai babubhai kamaliya Advocate - V D KAMLIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary Court Decision: The accused, Sarmanbhai Babubhai Kamliya, charged under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A) for allegedly possessing 0.2 liters of illicit alcohol on October 9, 2025, has been acquitted and discharged. The court found reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case, noting that the panchas (witnesses) did not adequately corroborate the seizure, proper investigation procedures were not followed, and the evidence linking the prohibited articles directly to the accused was insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 12-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 08-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1165/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court Decision: The accused, Sarmanbhai Babubhai Kamliya, charged under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A) for allegedly possessing 0.2 liters of illicit alcohol on October 9, 2025, has been acquitted and discharged. The court found reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case, noting that the panchas (witnesses) did not adequately corroborate the seizure, proper investigation procedures were not followed, and the evidence linking the prohibited articles directly to the accused was insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case