Govt. of Gujarat vs saramanbhai babubhai kamaliya Advocate - V D KAMLIYA — 1165/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS050016302025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1165/2025
Filing Date
08-12-2025
Registration No
1165/2025
Registration Date
08-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
855
Police Station
SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govt. of Gujarat
Respondent(s)
saramanbhai babubhai kamaliya Advocate - V D KAMLIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 12-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Court Decision: The accused, Sarmanbhai Babubhai Kamliya, charged under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A) for allegedly possessing 0.2 liters of illicit alcohol on October 9, 2025, has been acquitted and discharged. The court found reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case, noting that the panchas (witnesses) did not adequately corroborate the seizure, proper investigation procedures were not followed, and the evidence linking the prohibited articles directly to the accused was insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court Decision: The accused, Sarmanbhai Babubhai Kamliya, charged under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A) for allegedly possessing 0.2 liters of illicit alcohol on October 9, 2025, has been acquitted and discharged. The court found reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case, noting that the panchas (witnesses) did not adequately corroborate the seizure, proper investigation procedures were not followed, and the evidence linking the prohibited articles directly to the accused was insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts