Govt. of Gujarat vs polabhai bhanabhai vaja Advocate - M R RATHOD — 1152/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS050016172025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1152/2025

Filing Date

08-12-2025

Registration No

1152/2025

Registration Date

08-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

831

Police Station

SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

Govt. of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

polabhai bhanabhai vaja Advocate - M R RATHOD

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

16-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

12-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Sutrapad Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused, Polabhai Bhanabhai Raja, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A) for allegedly possessing 12 liters of illegal alcohol. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting the witnesses (panchas) did not adequately support the seizure and that critical procedural safeguards were compromised. The accused was acquitted with benefit of doubt and released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sutrapad Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused, Polabhai Bhanabhai Raja, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A) for allegedly possessing 12 liters of illegal alcohol. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting the witnesses (panchas) did not adequately support the seizure and that critical procedural safeguards were compromised. The accused was acquitted with benefit of doubt and released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case