Govt. of Gujarat vs hareshabhai nanajibhai parmar Advocate - H M VAJA — 1150/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS050016152025

Filing Number

1150/2025

Filing Date

08-Dec-2025

Registration No

1150/2025

Registration Date

08-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

803

Police Station

SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Govt. of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.hareshabhai nanajibhai parmar Advocate - H M VAJA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Sutrapad Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted accused Hareshbhai Nanajbhai Parmar of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA) for allegedly possessing alcohol without permit on September 18, 2025. The court found insufficient evidence and credibility issues with prosecution witnesses (panchas), noting the absence of technical expert evidence regarding the seized liquor's quality and quantity, and the failure to establish a direct connection between the prohibited articles and the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 12-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 08-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1150/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sutrapad Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted accused Hareshbhai Nanajbhai Parmar of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(AA) for allegedly possessing alcohol without permit on September 18, 2025. The court found insufficient evidence and credibility issues with prosecution witnesses (panchas), noting the absence of technical expert evidence regarding the seized liquor's quality and quantity, and the failure to establish a direct connection between the prohibited articles and the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case