Govt. of Gujarat vs hajabhai karsarnbhai kamaliya Advocate - V D KAMLIYA — 1147/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS050016122025
Filing Number
1147/2025
Filing Date
08-Dec-2025
Registration No
1147/2025
Registration Date
08-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
949
Police Station
SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Govt. of Gujarat
Respondent(s)
-
1.hajabhai karsarnbhai kamaliya Advocate - V D KAMLIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Judegement
Summary The Sutrapad First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted defendant Hajabhai Karshnabhai Kamliya of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A) for alleged illegal possession of 2 liters of alcohol on November 16, 2025. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting that witness testimony (panchas) did not corroborate the seizure evidence and critical procedural gaps undermined the investigation's credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1147/2025
Summary The Sutrapad First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted defendant Hajabhai Karshnabhai Kamliya of charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(A) for alleged illegal possession of 2 liters of alcohol on November 16, 2025. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting that witness testimony (panchas) did not corroborate the seizure evidence and critical procedural gaps undermined the investigation's credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts