Govt. of Gujarat vs arashibhai najabhai kamaliya Advocate - V D KAMLIYA — 1146/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS050016112025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1146/2025

Filing Date

08-12-2025

Registration No

1146/2025

Registration Date

08-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

954

Police Station

SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

Govt. of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

arashibhai najabhai kamaliya Advocate - V D KAMLIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

16-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

12-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Sutrapaida Judicial Magistrate First Class acquitted Arshhibhai Najabhai Kamliya of charges under Section 65(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court concluded that the prosecution failed to provide credible witness testimony, proper seizure documentation, and technical evidence connecting the recovered liquor directly to the accused, and therefore granted the benefit of doubt in accordance with criminal jurisprudence principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sutrapaida Judicial Magistrate First Class acquitted Arshhibhai Najabhai Kamliya of charges under Section 65(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court concluded that the prosecution failed to provide credible witness testimony, proper seizure documentation, and technical evidence connecting the recovered liquor directly to the accused, and therefore granted the benefit of doubt in accordance with criminal jurisprudence principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case