Govt. of Gujarat vs arashibhai najabhai kamaliya Advocate - V D KAMLIYA — 1146/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS050016112025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1146/2025
Filing Date
08-12-2025
Registration No
1146/2025
Registration Date
08-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
954
Police Station
SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govt. of Gujarat
Respondent(s)
arashibhai najabhai kamaliya Advocate - V D KAMLIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 12-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sutrapaida Judicial Magistrate First Class acquitted Arshhibhai Najabhai Kamliya of charges under Section 65(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court concluded that the prosecution failed to provide credible witness testimony, proper seizure documentation, and technical evidence connecting the recovered liquor directly to the accused, and therefore granted the benefit of doubt in accordance with criminal jurisprudence principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Sutrapaida Judicial Magistrate First Class acquitted Arshhibhai Najabhai Kamliya of charges under Section 65(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court concluded that the prosecution failed to provide credible witness testimony, proper seizure documentation, and technical evidence connecting the recovered liquor directly to the accused, and therefore granted the benefit of doubt in accordance with criminal jurisprudence principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts