Govt. of Gujarat vs SIDHHARAJSINH MANUBHA RATHOD Advocate - H M VAJA — 1137/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS050016022025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1137/2025

Filing Date

06-12-2025

Registration No

1137/2025

Registration Date

06-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

830

Police Station

SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

Govt. of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SIDHHARAJSINH MANUBHA RATHOD Advocate - H M VAJA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

16-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

12-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted the accused Sidhrajsinh Manubha Rathod of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act (Section 65(AA)) for illegal possession of country liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the panch witnesses did not support the prosecution's case and critical evidence was lacking, including absence of FSL examination and insufficient corroboration linking the seized contraband directly to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused Sidhrajsinh Manubha Rathod of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act (Section 65(AA)) for illegal possession of country liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the panch witnesses did not support the prosecution's case and critical evidence was lacking, including absence of FSL examination and insufficient corroboration linking the seized contraband directly to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case