Govt. of Gujarat vs shileshbhai dineshabhai jethava Advocate - V D KAMLIYA — 1102/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS050015522025

Filing Number

1102/2025

Filing Date

18-Nov-2025

Registration No

1102/2025

Registration Date

18-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

846

Police Station

SUTRAPADA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Govt. of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.shileshbhai dineshabhai jethava Advocate - V D KAMLIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Sutraparala First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted defendant Shaileshbhai Dineshbhai Jethwa of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(a), finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that critical prosecution witnesses (panchas) failed to corroborate the seizure of illicit liquor, the investigating officer lacked proper procedural compliance, and the link between the alleged contraband and the accused remained unestablished, warranting the benefit of doubt in favor of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 12-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 18-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1102/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sutraparala First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted defendant Shaileshbhai Dineshbhai Jethwa of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65(a), finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that critical prosecution witnesses (panchas) failed to corroborate the seizure of illicit liquor, the investigating officer lacked proper procedural compliance, and the link between the alleged contraband and the accused remained unestablished, warranting the benefit of doubt in favor of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case