BHARATBHAI BACHUBHAI KHUTAD vs MAHESHBHAI ARJANBHAI BHOLA PROPRITER OF KRINAL ENTERPRISE Advocate - A R BARAD — 986/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS050013542025
Filing Number
986/2025
Filing Date
20-09-2025
Registration No
986/2025
Registration Date
20-09-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHARATBHAI BACHUBHAI KHUTAD
Adv. B K BARAD
Respondent(s)
MAHESHBHAI ARJANBHAI BHOLA PROPRITER OF KRINAL ENTERPRISE Advocate - A R BARAD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PLEA
PLEA
PLEA
PLEA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PLEA |
| 12-02-2026 | PLEA |
| 20-01-2026 | PLEA |
| 19-12-2025 | PLEA |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the petitioner's case on procedural grounds, finding that Bharatbhai Bachubhai Khutad failed to prosecute the matter without justification and withdrew it voluntarily under Article 14. The court ordered the respondent (Maheshbhai Arjanbhai Bhola/Krinal Enterprise) to recover costs from the petitioner, with no separate order on expenses. The judgment was issued on 14 March 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the petitioner's case on procedural grounds, finding that Bharatbhai Bachubhai Khutad failed to prosecute the matter without justification and withdrew it voluntarily under Article 14. The court ordered the respondent (Maheshbhai Arjanbhai Bhola/Krinal Enterprise) to recover costs from the petitioner, with no separate order on expenses. The judgment was issued on 14 March 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts