JADAVBHAI RAMABHAI PAMPANIYA vs LATE. BHENIBEN W/O PUNJABHAI SOALNKINA VARSHO 1. PUNJABHAI GOVINDBHAI SOLANKI — 303/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,37,38,. Status: JUDGEMENT. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJGS050010022022
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
303/2022
Filing Date
07-11-2022
Registration No
303/2022
Registration Date
07-11-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JADAVBHAI RAMABHAI PAMPANIYA
Adv. H C CHAUHAN
VIRABHAI RAMBHAI PAMPANIYA
Adv. H C CHAUHAN
JIVABHAI RAMBHAI PAMPANIYA
Respondent(s)
LATE. BHENIBEN W/O PUNJABHAI SOALNKINA VARSHO 1. PUNJABHAI GOVINDBHAI SOLANKI
DEVSHIBHAI PUNJABHAI SOLANKI
Adv. I K CHANDNANI
MINIBEN D/O PUNJABHAI SOLANKI
Adv. K I CHANDNANI
VIJUBEN D/O PUNJABHAI SOLANKI
Adv. I K CHANDNANI
KADVIBEN D/O PUNJABHAI SOLANKI
Adv. I K CHANDNANI
DEVIBEN D/O PUNJABHAI SOLANKI
Adv. I K CHANDNANI
RANIBEN D/O PUNJABHAI SOLANKI
Adv. I K CHANDNANI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 23-02-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 29-01-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 19-01-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S No-303/2022 The court granted the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction. The defendants are restrained from interfering with the plaintiff's right of way on the disputed land (survey no-193) until final disposal of the suit. The court found that the plaintiff established a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and risk of irreparable loss, noting the plaintiff's alleged 100-year use of the way as evidenced by village maps and court commissioner reports. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S No-303/2022 The court granted the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction. The defendants are restrained from interfering with the plaintiff's right of way on the disputed land (survey no-193) until final disposal of the suit. The court found that the plaintiff established a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and risk of irreparable loss, noting the plaintiff's alleged 100-year use of the way as evidenced by village maps and court commissioner reports. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts