NUTANBEN W/O PREMJIBHAI UNEVAL vs PREMJIBHAI PARBATBHAI UNEVAL Advocate - H B JAMANI — 554/2024

Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 43,12. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Judgement Next hearing 18-Jun-2026

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATI- JMFC

CNR: GJGS040042172024

Filing Number

554/2024

Filing Date

08-Oct-2024

Registration No

554/2024

Registration Date

08-Oct-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, UNA

Judge

2-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 43,12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NUTANBEN W/O PREMJIBHAI UNEVAL

    Adv. L J SOLANKI

  2. 2.DHRUV S/O PREMJIBHAI UNEVAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PREMJIBHAI PARBATBHAI UNEVAL Advocate - H B JAMANI

  2. 2.PARBATBHAI NATHUBHAI UNEVAL

  3. 3.BENABEN PARBATBHAI UNEVAL

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-May-2026

    Judgement

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Judgement

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Cr.M.A. No. 554/2024 Outcome: The court rejected the complainant's postal communications seeking immediate replies outside regular judicial proceedings. The court clarified that all submissions must be made through proper applications filed on record with opportunity for the opposite party to be heard, and that judicial orders cannot be granted based on unilateral postal communications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 03-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  9. 31-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  10. 03-Dec-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  11. 29-Nov-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  12. 15-Nov-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  13. 20-Sep-2025

    Opponents Evidence

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  14. 30-Aug-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  15. 07-Aug-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  16. 19-Jul-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  17. 20-Jun-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  18. 29-May-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 15-May-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 01-May-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 30-Apr-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 29-Apr-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 24-Apr-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 23-Apr-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 18-Apr-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 29-Mar-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 28-Feb-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 24-Jan-2025

    Applicants Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 20-Dec-2024

    Notice To Respondents

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 12-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 08-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 554/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cr.M.A. No. 554/2024 Outcome: The court rejected the complainant's postal communications seeking immediate replies outside regular judicial proceedings. The court clarified that all submissions must be made through proper applications filed on record with opportunity for the opposite party to be heard, and that judicial orders cannot be granted based on unilateral postal communications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case