VALIBAI RANA @ MADHVIKABEN BHAVYESH JETHVA vs DHARMENDRAGIRI BALUGIRI GOSWAMI Advocate - R.A.PARMAR — 10/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Defendant Evidence. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJGS040015782020
Filing Number
10/2020
Filing Date
21-Jul-2020
Registration No
10/2020
Registration Date
21-Jul-2020
Court
TALUKA COURT, UNA
Judge
7-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VALIBAI RANA @ MADHVIKABEN BHAVYESH JETHVA
Adv. S.B.UPADHYAY
Respondent(s)
-
1.DHARMENDRAGIRI BALUGIRI GOSWAMI Advocate - R.A.PARMAR
Case History
-
20-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Apr-2026
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Apr-2026
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Mar-2026
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Feb-2026
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Feb-2026
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Feb-2026
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Jan-2026
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
26-Dec-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Nov-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Oct-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Sep-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-Aug-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Aug-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Jun-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-May-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Apr-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Mar-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Jan-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Dec-2024
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Dec-2024
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Oct-2024
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Aug-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Jul-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Jun-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-May-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Mar-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
26-Feb-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Feb-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Jan-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Dec-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Nov-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Oct-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Sep-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Sep-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Aug-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Jul-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Jul-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-May-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Apr-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Mar-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Feb-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Jan-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
26-Dec-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Nov-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Nov-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Sep-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
26-Sep-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Sep-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Aug-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Jul-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Jun-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Apr-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Mar-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Feb-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Jan-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Dec-2021
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Nov-2021
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Sep-2021
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Aug-2021
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Jul-2021
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-May-2021
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
31-Mar-2021
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Jan-2021
OrderView PDF
-
16-Jan-2021
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Sp.C.S.No.10 of 2020 Court: Principal Senior Civil Judge, Una (Gujarat) Decided: January 16, 2021 The plaintiff's interim injunction application was dismissed. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of fraud in the 2018 land sale transaction valued at Rs. 29 lakhs. Although the plaintiff claimed she received only Rs. 5 lakhs as a loan (not the stated consideration), the registered sale deed—endorsed by her in the sub-registrar's presence with her son as witness—carried greater evidentiary weight than her oral assertions. The court noted the defendant held legal title, possessed the property, and had developed it; granting injunction would cause irreparable harm to the defendant's business interests and create multiplicity of proceedings if further sales occurred. However, the defendant was directed to disclose the pending litigation in any future property conveyance deeds to protect innocent third parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jan-2021
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-Dec-2020
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Dec-2020
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Nov-2020
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Nov-2020
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Oct-2020
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Oct-2020
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Sep-2020
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Sep-2020
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
01-Sep-2020
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Aug-2020
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Aug-2020
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Jul-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jul-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 10/2020
Case Summary: Sp.C.S.No.10 of 2020 Court: Principal Senior Civil Judge, Una (Gujarat) Decided: January 16, 2021 The plaintiff's interim injunction application was dismissed. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of fraud in the 2018 land sale transaction valued at Rs. 29 lakhs. Although the plaintiff claimed she received only Rs. 5 lakhs as a loan (not the stated consideration), the registered sale deed—endorsed by her in the sub-registrar's presence with her son as witness—carried greater evidentiary weight than her oral assertions. The court noted the defendant held legal title, possessed the property, and had developed it; granting injunction would cause irreparable harm to the defendant's business interests and create multiplicity of proceedings if further sales occurred. However, the defendant was directed to disclose the pending litigation in any future property conveyance deeds to protect innocent third parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts