Govt. of Gujarat vs JAYESHBHAI NARANBHAI VANSH — 805/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),116(B),. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS040009862026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
805/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
805/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, UNA
Judge
7-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11186003260132
Police Station
NAVABANDAR MARINE POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govt. of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
JAYESHBHAI NARANBHAI VANSH
Hearing History
Judge: 7-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
LOK ADALAT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | LOK ADALAT | |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused, Jayeshbhai Naranbhai Vansh, under the Gujarat Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act-2016, sections 65(a) and 116(b), after the accused voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" must exist to impose sentences below the statutory minimum, the court exercised leniency considering the accused's financial condition and potential for reform. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹300, with one day's simple imprisonment as alternative punishment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted the accused, Jayeshbhai Naranbhai Vansh, under the Gujarat Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act-2016, sections 65(a) and 116(b), after the accused voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" must exist to impose sentences below the statutory minimum, the court exercised leniency considering the accused's financial condition and potential for reform. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹300, with one day's simple imprisonment as alternative punishment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts