Govt. of Gujarat vs SIDHU MERUBHAI CHUDASAMA — 727/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS040008562026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
727/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
727/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, UNA
Judge
7-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govt. of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SIDHU MERUBHAI CHUDASAMA
Hearing History
Judge: 7-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
LOK ADALAT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | LOK ADALAT | |
| 26-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused, Sidhu Meruabhai Churdas, under Section 66(1)B of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 2016, after he voluntarily confessed to the charge. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" must exist to impose less than the minimum sentence, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine (or 1 day simple imprisonment in default) considering the accused's financial condition and potential for reform. The court also ordered disposal of prohibited materials and made consequential orders regarding seized vehicle and mobile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted the accused, Sidhu Meruabhai Churdas, under Section 66(1)B of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 2016, after he voluntarily confessed to the charge. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" must exist to impose less than the minimum sentence, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine (or 1 day simple imprisonment in default) considering the accused's financial condition and potential for reform. The court also ordered disposal of prohibited materials and made consequential orders regarding seized vehicle and mobile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts