Govt. of Gujarat vs RAHULBHAI DAYABHAI PARMAR — 696/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS040008242026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

696/2026

Filing Date

25-02-2026

Registration No

696/2026

Registration Date

25-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UNA

Judge

7-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186008260098

Police Station

UNA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

Govt. of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RAHULBHAI DAYABHAI PARMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 7-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

LOK ADALAT

25-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court convicted the accused Rahulbhai Dayabhai Parmar under the Gujarat Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 2016, Section 27(b), based on his voluntary confession. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" must justify sentences below the statutory minimum, the court imposed a lenient sentence considering the accused's financial condition and prospects for reform. The accused was sentenced to a fine of ₹100 or one day simple imprisonment in default, with forfeiture of prohibited articles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused Rahulbhai Dayabhai Parmar under the Gujarat Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 2016, Section 27(b), based on his voluntary confession. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" must justify sentences below the statutory minimum, the court imposed a lenient sentence considering the accused's financial condition and prospects for reform. The accused was sentenced to a fine of ₹100 or one day simple imprisonment in default, with forfeiture of prohibited articles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, UNA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case