Govt. of Gujarat vs RAHULBHAI DAYABHAI PARMAR — 696/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS040008242026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
696/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
696/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, UNA
Judge
7-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11186008260098
Police Station
UNA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govt. of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RAHULBHAI DAYABHAI PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 7-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
LOK ADALAT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | LOK ADALAT | |
| 25-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused Rahulbhai Dayabhai Parmar under the Gujarat Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 2016, Section 27(b), based on his voluntary confession. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" must justify sentences below the statutory minimum, the court imposed a lenient sentence considering the accused's financial condition and prospects for reform. The accused was sentenced to a fine of ₹100 or one day simple imprisonment in default, with forfeiture of prohibited articles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted the accused Rahulbhai Dayabhai Parmar under the Gujarat Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 2016, Section 27(b), based on his voluntary confession. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" must justify sentences below the statutory minimum, the court imposed a lenient sentence considering the accused's financial condition and prospects for reform. The accused was sentenced to a fine of ₹100 or one day simple imprisonment in default, with forfeiture of prohibited articles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts