Govt. of Gujarat vs DANABHAI BHIKHABHAI BAMBHANIYA — 693/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS040008212026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
693/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
693/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, UNA
Judge
7-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govt. of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
DANABHAI BHIKHABHAI BAMBHANIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 7-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
LOK ADALAT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | LOK ADALAT | |
| 25-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused Danabhai Bhikhabhai Bambhaniya under Section 27 of the BNS (Gujarat Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 2016) after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" must exist to impose less than the minimum statutory sentence, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine (with one day imprisonment as alternative) considering the accused's financial condition and rehabilitation prospects. The court also ordered destruction of prohibited materials and issued directions regarding vehicles and mobile phones seized in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted the accused Danabhai Bhikhabhai Bambhaniya under Section 27 of the BNS (Gujarat Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 2016) after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" must exist to impose less than the minimum statutory sentence, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine (with one day imprisonment as alternative) considering the accused's financial condition and rehabilitation prospects. The court also ordered destruction of prohibited materials and issued directions regarding vehicles and mobile phones seized in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts