Govt. of Gujarat vs JITUBHAI @ BHIKHO DHIRUBHAI PARMAR KOLI — 428/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS040005192026
Filing Number
428/2026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
428/2026
Registration Date
06-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, UNA
Judge
2-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 21-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Govt. of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.JITUBHAI @ BHIKHO DHIRUBHAI PARMAR KOLI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The court convicted the accused under the Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) after he voluntarily pleaded guilty. Applying the principle that lenient sentences require special and adequate reasons peculiar to each case, the court imposed a minimal sentence of ₹100 fine, with one day simple imprisonment as the alternative if the fine remains unpaid, considering the accused's financial condition and circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-Mar-2026
Order
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 428/2026
Summary The court convicted the accused under the Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) after he voluntarily pleaded guilty. Applying the principle that lenient sentences require special and adequate reasons peculiar to each case, the court imposed a minimal sentence of ₹100 fine, with one day simple imprisonment as the alternative if the fine remains unpaid, considering the accused's financial condition and circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts