Govt. of Gujarat vs JITUBHAI @ BHIKHO DHIRUBHAI PARMAR KOLI — 428/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS040005192026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
428/2026
Filing Date
06-02-2026
Registration No
428/2026
Registration Date
06-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, UNA
Judge
2-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govt. of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
JITUBHAI @ BHIKHO DHIRUBHAI PARMAR KOLI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
ORDER
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 06-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court convicted the accused under the Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) after he voluntarily pleaded guilty. Applying the principle that lenient sentences require special and adequate reasons peculiar to each case, the court imposed a minimal sentence of ₹100 fine, with one day simple imprisonment as the alternative if the fine remains unpaid, considering the accused's financial condition and circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court convicted the accused under the Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) after he voluntarily pleaded guilty. Applying the principle that lenient sentences require special and adequate reasons peculiar to each case, the court imposed a minimal sentence of ₹100 fine, with one day simple imprisonment as the alternative if the fine remains unpaid, considering the accused's financial condition and circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts