Govt. of Gujarat vs BHUPATBHAI JINABHAI CHUDASMA — 425/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS040005162026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
425/2026
Filing Date
06-02-2026
Registration No
425/2026
Registration Date
06-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, UNA
Judge
2-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govt. of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BHUPATBHAI JINABHAI CHUDASMA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
ORDER
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 06-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 06-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Prohibition Act based on their voluntary confession and imposed lenient punishment of Rs. 100 fine, with one day simple imprisonment as alternative if the fine remains unpaid. The court adopted a lenient approach considering the accused's economic circumstances and plea for mercy, while relying on the precedent that lesser sentences require special and adequate reasons recorded in judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Prohibition Act based on their voluntary confession and imposed lenient punishment of Rs. 100 fine, with one day simple imprisonment as alternative if the fine remains unpaid. The court adopted a lenient approach considering the accused's economic circumstances and plea for mercy, while relying on the precedent that lesser sentences require special and adequate reasons recorded in judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts