Govt. of Gujarat vs BHUPATBHAI JINABHAI CHUDASMA — 425/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS040005162026

Filing Number

425/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

425/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UNA

Judge

2-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Govt. of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHUPATBHAI JINABHAI CHUDASMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Prohibition Act based on their voluntary confession and imposed lenient punishment of Rs. 100 fine, with one day simple imprisonment as alternative if the fine remains unpaid. The court adopted a lenient approach considering the accused's economic circumstances and plea for mercy, while relying on the precedent that lesser sentences require special and adequate reasons recorded in judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Order

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 425/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Prohibition Act based on their voluntary confession and imposed lenient punishment of Rs. 100 fine, with one day simple imprisonment as alternative if the fine remains unpaid. The court adopted a lenient approach considering the accused's economic circumstances and plea for mercy, while relying on the precedent that lesser sentences require special and adequate reasons recorded in judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case