Govt. of Gujarat vs DIVYESHBHAI PRAVINBHAI DAFADA — 367/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS040004512026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
367/2026
Filing Date
02-02-2026
Registration No
367/2026
Registration Date
02-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, UNA
Judge
2-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govt. of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
DIVYESHBHAI PRAVINBHAI DAFADA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
ORDER
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 24-02-2026 | ORDER | |
| 05-02-2026 | ORDER | |
| 02-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Una convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Prohibition Act, finding that the accused voluntarily confessed to the offense. Citing the Gujarat High Court precedent on "special and adequate reasons," the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹100 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default) considering the accused's financial condition and possibility of reformation. The judgment was delivered on 14/03/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Una convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Prohibition Act, finding that the accused voluntarily confessed to the offense. Citing the Gujarat High Court precedent on "special and adequate reasons," the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹100 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default) considering the accused's financial condition and possibility of reformation. The judgment was delivered on 14/03/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts