Govt. of Gujarat vs DIVYESHBHAI PRAVINBHAI DAFADA — 367/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS040004512026

Filing Number

367/2026

Filing Date

02-Feb-2026

Registration No

367/2026

Registration Date

02-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UNA

Judge

2-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Govt. of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DIVYESHBHAI PRAVINBHAI DAFADA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Una convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Prohibition Act, finding that the accused voluntarily confessed to the offense. Citing the Gujarat High Court precedent on "special and adequate reasons," the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹100 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default) considering the accused's financial condition and possibility of reformation. The judgment was delivered on 14/03/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Order

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Order

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    Order

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 367/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate at Una convicted the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Prohibition Act, finding that the accused voluntarily confessed to the offense. Citing the Gujarat High Court precedent on "special and adequate reasons," the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹100 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default) considering the accused's financial condition and possibility of reformation. The judgment was delivered on 14/03/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case