Govt. of Gujarat vs BHIMJIBHAI RUKHADBHAI VEGAD — 275/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),66(1),(B),(C),(D). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS040003042026

Filing Number

275/2026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

275/2026

Registration Date

19-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UNA

Judge

5-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),66(1),(B),(C),(D)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Govt. of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHIMJIBHAI RUKHADBHAI VEGAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Special Magistrate Court in Una found the accused, Bhimjibhai Rukhdbhai Vegad, guilty under the Prohibition Act sections 65(A)(A), 66(1)(B), (C), and (D) for illegal liquor possession/sale. The court sentenced the accused to imprisonment until court rising and imposed a fine of ₹200, with an additional 5-day simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid; the seized liquor shall be destroyed as per regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 275/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Magistrate Court in Una found the accused, Bhimjibhai Rukhdbhai Vegad, guilty under the Prohibition Act sections 65(A)(A), 66(1)(B), (C), and (D) for illegal liquor possession/sale. The court sentenced the accused to imprisonment until court rising and imposed a fine of ₹200, with an additional 5-day simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid; the seized liquor shall be destroyed as per regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case