Govt. of Gujarat vs NANIBEN JEMBHAI URFE KALUBHAI MAKWANA — 128/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),116 B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS040001322026

Filing Number

128/2026

Filing Date

06-Jan-2026

Registration No

128/2026

Registration Date

06-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UNA

Judge

2-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186003250993

Police Station

NAVABANDAR MARINE POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),116 B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Govt. of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NANIBEN JEMBHAI URFE KALUBHAI MAKWANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The court found the accused guilty under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) after he voluntarily confessed to the charge. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" must exist to impose less than minimum sentencing, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹400 fine (or 1 day imprisonment if unpaid) considering the accused's financial condition and circumstances. The seized liquor was ordered to be disposed of according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 06-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 06-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 128/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court found the accused guilty under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) after he voluntarily confessed to the charge. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" must exist to impose less than minimum sentencing, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹400 fine (or 1 day imprisonment if unpaid) considering the accused's financial condition and circumstances. The seized liquor was ordered to be disposed of according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case