Govt. of Gujarat vs NANIBEN JEMBHAI URFE KALUBHAI MAKWANA — 128/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),116 B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS040001322026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

128/2026

Filing Date

06-01-2026

Registration No

128/2026

Registration Date

06-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UNA

Judge

2-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186003250993

Police Station

NAVABANDAR MARINE POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),116 B

Petitioner(s)

Govt. of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

NANIBEN JEMBHAI URFE KALUBHAI MAKWANA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

ORDER

10-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

09-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

16-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The court found the accused guilty under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) after he voluntarily confessed to the charge. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" must exist to impose less than minimum sentencing, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹400 fine (or 1 day imprisonment if unpaid) considering the accused's financial condition and circumstances. The seized liquor was ordered to be disposed of according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court found the accused guilty under the Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(A) after he voluntarily confessed to the charge. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" must exist to impose less than minimum sentencing, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹400 fine (or 1 day imprisonment if unpaid) considering the accused's financial condition and circumstances. The seized liquor was ordered to be disposed of according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, UNA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case