RASIKBHAI JINABHAI BAMBHANIYA vs Govt. of Gujarat Advocate - M K GOHEL — 6/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 02nd April 2026.
CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION
CNR: GJGS030001262026
Filing Number
6/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
6/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, UNA
Judge
2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11186008250073
Police Station
UNA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RASIKBHAI JINABHAI BAMBHANIYA
Adv. L J SOLANKI
Respondent(s)
Govt. of Gujarat Advocate - M K GOHEL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 25-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 23-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
| 20-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed Rasikbhai Bambhaniya's revision application and set aside the trial magistrate's order rejecting his request for interim custody of his seized Yamaha Fascino motorcycle (GJ-32-Q-9264). The court found the lower court's rejection was illegal, noting the 20 liters of liquor seized did not exceed prescribed limits, the applicant was the registered owner with no rival claims, and the accused filed "no claim" documents. The motorcycle was released to the applicant subject to executing a bond (1.5 times vehicle value) and conditions prohibiting illegal use and requiring production before the court as needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed Rasikbhai Bambhaniya's revision application and set aside the trial magistrate's order rejecting his request for interim custody of his seized Yamaha Fascino motorcycle (GJ-32-Q-9264). The court found the lower court's rejection was illegal, noting the 20 liters of liquor seized did not exceed prescribed limits, the applicant was the registered owner with no rival claims, and the accused filed "no claim" documents. The motorcycle was released to the applicant subject to executing a bond (1.5 times vehicle value) and conditions prohibiting illegal use and requiring production before the court as needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts