SANJAYBHAI BHIMABHAI BAMBHANIYA vs PRITIBEN RAMESHCHANDRA TRIVEDI MANAGER OF GLOBAL CREDIT AND CONSUMER COOPERATIVE SOCIETY Advocate - A N DESHAVAL — 11/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJGS030001072026
Filing Number
11/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
11/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, UNA
Judge
2-Addl. District Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJAYBHAI BHIMABHAI BAMBHANIYA
Adv. C B BAMBHANIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRITIBEN RAMESHCHANDRA TRIVEDI MANAGER OF GLOBAL CREDIT AND CONSUMER COOPERATIVE SOCIETY Advocate - A N DESHAVAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court allowed Sanjaybhai Bhimabhai Bambhaniya's criminal appeal and acquitted him of cheque dishonor charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after both parties reached a compromise settlement. The conviction order from the lower court dated 04.08.2025 was quashed, considering the compoundable nature of the offense and that the appellant had already served approximately 25 days of imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addl. District Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
Final Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Order On Urgent Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 11/2026
The court allowed Sanjaybhai Bhimabhai Bambhaniya's criminal appeal and acquitted him of cheque dishonor charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after both parties reached a compromise settlement. The conviction order from the lower court dated 04.08.2025 was quashed, considering the compoundable nature of the offense and that the appellant had already served approximately 25 days of imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts