MAHESHBHAI ALIAS MAYURBHAI MALABHAI SOLANKI vs Govt. of Gujarat Advocate - M K GOHEL — 44/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC.APPLI - SESSIONS

CNR: GJGS030000992026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

44/2026

Filing Date

20-02-2026

Registration No

44/2026

Registration Date

20-02-2026

Court

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, UNA

Judge

2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186003220082

Police Station

NAVABANDAR MARINE POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

LIMITATION ACT, 1963 Section 5,

Petitioner(s)

MAHESHBHAI ALIAS MAYURBHAI MALABHAI SOLANKI

Adv. S V KADRI

AKSHAYBHAI MALABHAI SOLANKI

Adv. S V KADRI

BHARATBHAI PANCHABHAI SOLANKI

Adv. S V KADRI

Respondent(s)

Govt. of Gujarat Advocate - M K GOHEL

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

13-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

HEARING

05-03-2026

HEARING

27-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The Additional Sessions Court of Una, Gujarat granted condonation of delay in filing an appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court found that the appellants (three fishing laborers) had presented a bonafide explanation for the 48-day delay—they were away fishing when the judgment was delivered and only learned of it upon returning—and imposed a condition requiring them to deposit Rs. 6,000 as court cost within seven days before the appeal could be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Court of Una, Gujarat granted condonation of delay in filing an appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court found that the appellants (three fishing laborers) had presented a bonafide explanation for the 48-day delay—they were away fishing when the judgment was delivered and only learned of it upon returning—and imposed a condition requiring them to deposit Rs. 6,000 as court cost within seven days before the appeal could be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, UNA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case