State of Gujarat vs VISHALBHAI KESHUBHAI VALA Advocate - C V DHOLIYA — 3158/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 30th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020048512025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

3158/2025

Filing Date

22-12-2025

Registration No

3158/2025

Registration Date

22-12-2025

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

14-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186004250651

Police Station

PRABHAS PATAN POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 281

Petitioner(s)

State of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

VISHALBHAI KESHUBHAI VALA Advocate - C V DHOLIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 14-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

30-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

23-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

13-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

21-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Veraval acquitted defendant Vishalbaai Keshubaai Vala of charges under IPC Section 281 (rash or negligent driving endangering human life). The court found that while the prosecution's evidence showed the defendant allegedly drove a rickshaw recklessly on a public road, the testimony of key witnesses (panchas/panchayat members) was insufficient to corroborate the claims, and no independent witnesses were recorded despite the incident occurring in a public area, resulting in acquittal based on lack of credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Veraval acquitted defendant Vishalbaai Keshubaai Vala of charges under IPC Section 281 (rash or negligent driving endangering human life). The court found that while the prosecution's evidence showed the defendant allegedly drove a rickshaw recklessly on a public road, the testimony of key witnesses (panchas/panchayat members) was insufficient to corroborate the claims, and no independent witnesses were recorded despite the incident occurring in a public area, resulting in acquittal based on lack of credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court, Veraval All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case