State of Gujarat vs VISHALBHAI KESHUBHAI VALA Advocate - C V DHOLIYA — 3158/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS020048512025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3158/2025
Filing Date
22-12-2025
Registration No
3158/2025
Registration Date
22-12-2025
Court
Civil Court, Veraval
Judge
14-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
FIR Details
FIR Number
11186004250651
Police Station
PRABHAS PATAN POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
VISHALBHAI KESHUBHAI VALA Advocate - C V DHOLIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 14-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 23-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 21-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Veraval acquitted defendant Vishalbaai Keshubaai Vala of charges under IPC Section 281 (rash or negligent driving endangering human life). The court found that while the prosecution's evidence showed the defendant allegedly drove a rickshaw recklessly on a public road, the testimony of key witnesses (panchas/panchayat members) was insufficient to corroborate the claims, and no independent witnesses were recorded despite the incident occurring in a public area, resulting in acquittal based on lack of credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Veraval acquitted defendant Vishalbaai Keshubaai Vala of charges under IPC Section 281 (rash or negligent driving endangering human life). The court found that while the prosecution's evidence showed the defendant allegedly drove a rickshaw recklessly on a public road, the testimony of key witnesses (panchas/panchayat members) was insufficient to corroborate the claims, and no independent witnesses were recorded despite the incident occurring in a public area, resulting in acquittal based on lack of credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts