State of Gujarat vs VINUBHAI BABUBHAI SUVARIYA Advocate - A L SOSA — 3137/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020048122025

Filing Number

3137/2025

Filing Date

16-Dec-2025

Registration No

3137/2025

Registration Date

16-Dec-2025

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

10-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186004250873

Police Station

PRABHAS PATAN POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VINUBHAI BABUBHAI SUVARIYA Advocate - A L SOSA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found accused Vinubhai Babubhai Suvariya guilty under Section 66(1)B IPC after he voluntarily confessed to the charge. Applying the principle that special and adequate reasons must exist for imposing lesser sentences, the court adopted a lenient approach considering the accused's financial condition and plea for mercy. The accused was sentenced to a fine of Rs. 100 with imprisonment until court rising, or one day simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Order

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 31-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 16-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 16-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3137/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court found accused Vinubhai Babubhai Suvariya guilty under Section 66(1)B IPC after he voluntarily confessed to the charge. Applying the principle that special and adequate reasons must exist for imposing lesser sentences, the court adopted a lenient approach considering the accused's financial condition and plea for mercy. The accused was sentenced to a fine of Rs. 100 with imprisonment until court rising, or one day simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case