HARSHABEN JAYESHBHAI RAVLIYA D O BHAGWANBHAI RAM vs JAYESHBHAI NATHABHAI RAVLIYA — 715/2025
Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 20(6)((1). Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 02nd May 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATI- JMFC
CNR: GJGS020042722025
Filing Number
715/2025
Filing Date
13-Nov-2025
Registration No
715/2025
Registration Date
13-Nov-2025
Court
Civil Court, Veraval
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
02-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARSHABEN JAYESHBHAI RAVLIYA D O BHAGWANBHAI RAM
Adv. D P CHAVADA
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAYESHBHAI NATHABHAI RAVLIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-May-2026
OrderView PDF
The court judgment dated 02/05/2026 addresses a matrimonial dispute where the petitioner sought to withdraw the case and dismiss proceedings. The court granted the withdrawal petition under relevant procedural rules, allowing the case to be closed. Costs were imposed on the respondent as per court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-May-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Apr-2026
Order
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Apr-2026
Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Mar-2026
Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Feb-2026
Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Jan-2026
Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
26-Dec-2025
Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Dec-2025
Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 715/2025
The court judgment dated 02/05/2026 addresses a matrimonial dispute where the petitioner sought to withdraw the case and dismiss proceedings. The court granted the withdrawal petition under relevant procedural rules, allowing the case to be closed. Costs were imposed on the respondent as per court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts