State of Gujarat vs JITENDRA URFE ABBAS GOVABHAI VAYLU Advocate - V C MAVADHIYA — 2646/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65E,81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 15th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS020040282025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2646/2025
Filing Date
04-10-2025
Registration No
2646/2025
Registration Date
04-10-2025
Court
Civil Court, Veraval
Judge
10-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11186004250575
Police Station
PRABHAS PATAN POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
JITENDRA URFE ABBAS GOVABHAI VAYLU Advocate - V C MAVADHIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 10-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 03-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 23-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 23-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Jitendra alias Abbas Goswami, of charges under the Bombay Prohibition Act (Section 65 E, 81). The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting critical gaps including lack of independent witness corroboration, absence of proper raid documentation (photographs/videos), and reliance solely on police testimony without supporting evidence. The accused was granted bail of Rs. 10,000 with a 6-month validity period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Jitendra alias Abbas Goswami, of charges under the Bombay Prohibition Act (Section 65 E, 81). The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting critical gaps including lack of independent witness corroboration, absence of proper raid documentation (photographs/videos), and reliance solely on police testimony without supporting evidence. The accused was granted bail of Rs. 10,000 with a 6-month validity period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts