State of Gujarat vs JITENDRA URFE ABBAS GOVABHAI VAYLU Advocate - V C MAVADHIYA — 2646/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65E,81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 15th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020040282025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2646/2025

Filing Date

04-10-2025

Registration No

2646/2025

Registration Date

04-10-2025

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

10-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186004250575

Police Station

PRABHAS PATAN POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65E,81

Petitioner(s)

State of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

JITENDRA URFE ABBAS GOVABHAI VAYLU Advocate - V C MAVADHIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 10-4th ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

15-04-2026

Disposed

03-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

23-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

09-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

23-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

15-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Jitendra alias Abbas Goswami, of charges under the Bombay Prohibition Act (Section 65 E, 81). The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting critical gaps including lack of independent witness corroboration, absence of proper raid documentation (photographs/videos), and reliance solely on police testimony without supporting evidence. The accused was granted bail of Rs. 10,000 with a 6-month validity period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Jitendra alias Abbas Goswami, of charges under the Bombay Prohibition Act (Section 65 E, 81). The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting critical gaps including lack of independent witness corroboration, absence of proper raid documentation (photographs/videos), and reliance solely on police testimony without supporting evidence. The accused was granted bail of Rs. 10,000 with a 6-month validity period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court, Veraval All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case