nankiben w/o sevaram nathani @ soneiya vs deviben baldev nathani Advocate - K I CHANDNANI — 118/2015
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 Section 028. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJGS020018152015
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
Filing Number
118/2015
Filing Date
05-10-2015
Registration No
118/2015
Registration Date
05-10-2015
Court
Civil Court, Veraval
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
nankiben w/o sevaram nathani @ soneiya
Adv. P R DAVE
Respondent(s)
deviben baldev nathani Advocate - K I CHANDNANI
hiranand tolaram nathani
sanchalk president shree visa sorathiya vanik student mandal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 20-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 30-01-2026 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Case Summary - RCS 118/2015 The suit filed by Nankiben against Deviben Baldev Nathani and others on 05/10/2015 seeking permanent injunction and declaration was dismissed for default on 25/07/2017. The plaintiff remained absent throughout proceedings, failed to produce evidence despite the court framing issues on 30/12/2016, and did not pay the ordered costs of Rs.250/-. The court found the plaintiff had no interest in pursuing the matter and dismissed the suit for want of process and plaintiff's absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary - RCS 118/2015 The suit filed by Nankiben against Deviben Baldev Nathani and others on 05/10/2015 seeking permanent injunction and declaration was dismissed for default on 25/07/2017. The plaintiff remained absent throughout proceedings, failed to produce evidence despite the court framing issues on 30/12/2016, and did not pay the ordered costs of Rs.250/-. The court found the plaintiff had no interest in pursuing the matter and dismissed the suit for want of process and plaintiff's absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts