The State Of Gujarat vs AAKASH DILIPBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - P.D.CHOMAL — 806/2019
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65E. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS020016082019
Filing Number
806/2019
Filing Date
30-Jul-2019
Registration No
806/2019
Registration Date
30-Jul-2019
Court
Civil Court, Veraval
Judge
10-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 21-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State Of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.AAKASH DILIPBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - P.D.CHOMAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Judegement
Case Summary The court acquitted the accused Akash Dilipbhai Solanki of charges under the Bombay Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for alleged possession of illicit liquor, finding the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The judge noted that the complainant's evidence lacked corroboration from independent witnesses, the panch (witness) statements did not support the panchnama (seizure document), and no other credible evidence substantiated the accusations, warranting acquittal with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Mar-2026
Judgement
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
07-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
02-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
02-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
19-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
22-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
03-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
22-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
08-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
28-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
17-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
27-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
17-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
30-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Jun-2024
Warrant Of Arrest
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
04-Jun-2024
Warrant Of Arrest
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Apr-2024
Warrant Of Arrest
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Mar-2024
Warrant Of Arrest
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-Feb-2024
Warrant Of Arrest
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
01-Dec-2023
Warrant Of Arrest
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Oct-2023
Warrant Of Arrest
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
23-Aug-2023
Warrant Of Arrest
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
05-Jul-2023
Warrant Of Arrest
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-May-2023
Warrant Of Arrest
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
23-Feb-2023
Warrant Of Arrest
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
17-Jan-2023
Warrant Of Arrest
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Nov-2022
Warrant Of Arrest
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Sep-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Aug-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Jun-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Jun-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Apr-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Feb-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Dec-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Oct-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Sep-2021
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Jul-2021
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jun-2021
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-May-2021
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Apr-2021
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Mar-2021
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Feb-2021
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Feb-2021
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Jan-2021
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Dec-2020
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Nov-2020
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Sep-2020
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Jul-2020
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Jul-2020
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-May-2020
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Mar-2020
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Mar-2020
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Feb-2020
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Jan-2020
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Dec-2019
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jul-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jul-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 806/2019
Case Summary The court acquitted the accused Akash Dilipbhai Solanki of charges under the Bombay Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for alleged possession of illicit liquor, finding the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The judge noted that the complainant's evidence lacked corroboration from independent witnesses, the panch (witness) statements did not support the panchnama (seizure document), and no other credible evidence substantiated the accusations, warranting acquittal with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts