PANDE RATNESH RAMKUMAR vs State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 192/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATI- JMFC
CNR: GJGS020008942026
Filing Number
192/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
192/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
Civil Court, Veraval
Judge
8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PANDE RATNESH RAMKUMAR
Respondent(s)
State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Disposed
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 192/2026 - Pande Ratnesh Ramkumar v. State of Gujarat The court granted the petitioner's application under BNS Section 503 to recover funds (Rs. 401/- and Rs. 2,959/-) that were frozen in two bank accounts after a cyber fraud complaint. The court found that no FIR had been filed, no arrests made despite considerable time passing, and no other claimants came forward, while the investigating officer recommended returning the funds to the petitioner. The court ordered the banks to deposit the seized amounts into the petitioner's accounts, subject to conditions that the funds be produced before the court when required and returned if other legitimate claimants prove their rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 192/2026 - Pande Ratnesh Ramkumar v. State of Gujarat The court granted the petitioner's application under BNS Section 503 to recover funds (Rs. 401/- and Rs. 2,959/-) that were frozen in two bank accounts after a cyber fraud complaint. The court found that no FIR had been filed, no arrests made despite considerable time passing, and no other claimants came forward, while the investigating officer recommended returning the funds to the petitioner. The court ordered the banks to deposit the seized amounts into the petitioner's accounts, subject to conditions that the funds be produced before the court when required and returned if other legitimate claimants prove their rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts