State of Gujarat vs AABID @ SALEMANBHAI AAMADBHAI GOEHL — 538/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020008912026

Filing Number

538/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

538/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

10-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186004250788

Police Station

PRABHAS PATAN POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AABID @ SALEMANBHAI AAMADBHAI GOEHL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found accused Aabid @ Salemanbhai Aamadbhai Goehl guilty under Section 66(1)(b) of the BNS after he voluntarily confessed to the charge. Applying the precedent that sentencing below the minimum requires special and adequate reasons, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹100 fine with time-served imprisonment, considering the accused's financial condition and grounds for clemency. In default of fine payment, the accused is liable to serve one day simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 538/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found accused Aabid @ Salemanbhai Aamadbhai Goehl guilty under Section 66(1)(b) of the BNS after he voluntarily confessed to the charge. Applying the precedent that sentencing below the minimum requires special and adequate reasons, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹100 fine with time-served imprisonment, considering the accused's financial condition and grounds for clemency. In default of fine payment, the accused is liable to serve one day simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case