State of Gujarat vs ASLAM GARIBSHA RAFAI FAKIR — 537/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020008902026

Filing Number

537/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

537/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

10-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186004250410

Police Station

PRABHAS PATAN POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASLAM GARIBSHA RAFAI FAKIR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 537/2026 The court found accused Aslam Garibsha Rafai Fakir guilty under BNS Section 27P for an offense under IPC Section 66(1)B after he voluntarily confessed to the charge. Applying the principle that special and adequate reasons justify sentences below the minimum prescribed, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹100 fine with imprisonment until court rising, considering the accused's economic circumstances and plea for mercy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 537/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 537/2026 The court found accused Aslam Garibsha Rafai Fakir guilty under BNS Section 27P for an offense under IPC Section 66(1)B after he voluntarily confessed to the charge. Applying the principle that special and adequate reasons justify sentences below the minimum prescribed, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹100 fine with imprisonment until court rising, considering the accused's economic circumstances and plea for mercy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case