State of Gujarat vs BHARATBHAI AMARSHIBHAI KAVA — 536/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020008892026

Filing Number

536/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

536/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

10-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186004250971

Police Station

PRABHAS PATAN POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHARATBHAI AMARSHIBHAI KAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Bharatbhai Amarshibhai Kava (536/2026) The accused Bharatbhai Amarshibhai Kava pleaded guilty to charges under Section 66(1)(b) of the relevant statute. The court, considering the accused's voluntary confession, financial circumstances, and appeal for mercy, imposed a lenient sentence: a fine of ₹100 with time already served as imprisonment, or one day simple imprisonment in default of payment. The court applied discretionary leniency based on special and adequate reasons peculiar to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 536/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Bharatbhai Amarshibhai Kava (536/2026) The accused Bharatbhai Amarshibhai Kava pleaded guilty to charges under Section 66(1)(b) of the relevant statute. The court, considering the accused's voluntary confession, financial circumstances, and appeal for mercy, imposed a lenient sentence: a fine of ₹100 with time already served as imprisonment, or one day simple imprisonment in default of payment. The court applied discretionary leniency based on special and adequate reasons peculiar to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case