State of Gujarat vs IKBAL GULAMHUSEN MALEK — 535/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020008882026

Filing Number

535/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

535/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

10-4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186004251051

Police Station

PRABHAS PATAN POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.IKBAL GULAMHUSEN MALEK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found accused Ikbal Gulamhusen Malek guilty under IPC Section 67A (prohibition offense) after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying a lenient approach considering his financial condition and plea for mercy, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹500 with imprisonment until the rising of court, or one day simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. Confiscated prohibited materials were ordered destroyed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 535/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found accused Ikbal Gulamhusen Malek guilty under IPC Section 67A (prohibition offense) after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying a lenient approach considering his financial condition and plea for mercy, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹500 with imprisonment until the rising of court, or one day simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. Confiscated prohibited materials were ordered destroyed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case