State of Gujarat vs HIRABHAI MONJIBHAI LODHARI — 532/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020008832026

Filing Number

532/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

532/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

15-Addl. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

9260226

Police Station

VERAVAL POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HIRABHAI MONJIBHAI LODHARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 532/2026 The court found accused Hirabhai Monjibhai Lodhari guilty under BNS Section 27(p) for an offense under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 66(1)(b). Applying the principle that special and adequate reasons are required to impose sentences below the statutory minimum, the court exercised discretionary leniency considering the accused's economic circumstances and plea for mercy. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 with imprisonment till rising of court, or one day simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 532/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 532/2026 The court found accused Hirabhai Monjibhai Lodhari guilty under BNS Section 27(p) for an offense under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 66(1)(b). Applying the principle that special and adequate reasons are required to impose sentences below the statutory minimum, the court exercised discretionary leniency considering the accused's economic circumstances and plea for mercy. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 with imprisonment till rising of court, or one day simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case