State of Gujarat vs JAYABEN KANJIBHAI CHOMAL — 529/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020008802026

Filing Number

529/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

529/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

15-Addl. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186009260121

Police Station

VERAVAL POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAYABEN KANJIBHAI CHOMAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 529/2026 Summary: The court found defendant Jayaben Kanjibhai Chomal guilty under IPC Section 6P (as per BNS) after she voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" are required to impose sentences less than the statutory minimum, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹500 fine with time served as imprisonment, considering the accused's financial circumstances and plea for mercy. Confiscated contraband items were ordered destroyed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 529/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 529/2026 Summary: The court found defendant Jayaben Kanjibhai Chomal guilty under IPC Section 6P (as per BNS) after she voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying the principle that "special and adequate reasons" are required to impose sentences less than the statutory minimum, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹500 fine with time served as imprisonment, considering the accused's financial circumstances and plea for mercy. Confiscated contraband items were ordered destroyed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case