State of Gujarat vs LAXMIBEN VIJAYBHAI VANIK — 528/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020008792026

Filing Number

528/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

528/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

15-Addl. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186009260127

Police Station

VERAVAL POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LAXMIBEN VIJAYBHAI VANIK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Laxmiben Vijaybhai Vanik (528/2026) The accused Laxmiben Vijaybhai Vanik voluntarily confessed to the charges under Section 6(a) of the relevant statute. The court, applying the principle that lenient sentencing is permissible when special and adequate reasons exist, imposed a reduced sentence of ₹500 fine with time served in custody, rather than the statutory minimum, considering the accused's financial condition and plea for mercy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 528/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Laxmiben Vijaybhai Vanik (528/2026) The accused Laxmiben Vijaybhai Vanik voluntarily confessed to the charges under Section 6(a) of the relevant statute. The court, applying the principle that lenient sentencing is permissible when special and adequate reasons exist, imposed a reduced sentence of ₹500 fine with time served in custody, rather than the statutory minimum, considering the accused's financial condition and plea for mercy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case