State of Gujarat vs BHANUBEN HARIBHAI GOHEL — 527/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS020008782026
Filing Number
527/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
527/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
Civil Court, Veraval
Judge
15-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11186009260101
Police Station
VERAVAL POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BHANUBEN HARIBHAI GOHEL
Hearing History
Judge: 15-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 527/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Bhanuben Haribhai Gohel The accused, Bhanuben Haribhai Gohel, voluntarily confessed to the charge under Section 67A of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court, considering the accused's voluntary confession, financial circumstances, and plea for mercy, imposed a lenient sentence rather than the minimum prescribed punishment, finding this approach served the ends of justice. Decision: The accused was convicted and sentenced to a fine of ₹500, with one day simple imprisonment as alternative punishment if the fine remains unpaid. Seized contraband items were ordered to be destroyed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 527/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Bhanuben Haribhai Gohel The accused, Bhanuben Haribhai Gohel, voluntarily confessed to the charge under Section 67A of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court, considering the accused's voluntary confession, financial circumstances, and plea for mercy, imposed a lenient sentence rather than the minimum prescribed punishment, finding this approach served the ends of justice. Decision: The accused was convicted and sentenced to a fine of ₹500, with one day simple imprisonment as alternative punishment if the fine remains unpaid. Seized contraband items were ordered to be destroyed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts