State of Gujarat vs JASODABEN DHANSUKHBHAI CHAGLI — 526/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020008772026

Filing Number

526/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

526/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

15-Addl. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186009260071

Police Station

VERAVAL POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JASODABEN DHANSUKHBHAI CHAGLI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    In case 526/2026, the court found Jasodaben Dhansukhbhai Chagli guilty under Section 64A of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act after she voluntarily admitted to the charges. Applying leniency principles and considering her financial circumstances and request for mercy, the court sentenced her to a fine of Rs. 500 with simple imprisonment of one day as default punishment, and ordered destruction of seized prohibited items after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 526/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In case 526/2026, the court found Jasodaben Dhansukhbhai Chagli guilty under Section 64A of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act after she voluntarily admitted to the charges. Applying leniency principles and considering her financial circumstances and request for mercy, the court sentenced her to a fine of Rs. 500 with simple imprisonment of one day as default punishment, and ordered destruction of seized prohibited items after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case