State of Gujarat vs PANBAI HARIBHAI MOTIVARAS — 525/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGS020008762026

Filing Number

525/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

525/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

15-Addl. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11186009260126

Police Station

VERAVAL POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PANBAI HARIBHAI MOTIVARAS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted accused Panbai Haribhai Motivaras under Section 6(a) of the Prohibition Act, finding him guilty of a prohibited offense. Given the accused's voluntary confession, economic circumstances, and appeal for leniency, the court exercised judicial discretion and imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 500 fine with time served, or one day's simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. Seized contraband was ordered to be destroyed post-appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 525/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted accused Panbai Haribhai Motivaras under Section 6(a) of the Prohibition Act, finding him guilty of a prohibited offense. Given the accused's voluntary confession, economic circumstances, and appeal for leniency, the court exercised judicial discretion and imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 500 fine with time served, or one day's simple imprisonment in default of fine payment. Seized contraband was ordered to be destroyed post-appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case