KOTWAL NAJMA HAJI vs State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 190/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATI- JMFC
CNR: GJGS020008752026
Filing Number
190/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
190/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
Civil Court, Veraval
Judge
8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KOTWAL NAJMA HAJI
Respondent(s)
State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Disposed
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 190/2026 The court granted petitioner Kotwal Najma Haji's application under BNS Section 503 to recover ₹61,000 that was seized from her bank accounts following a cyber fraud complaint. The court found that funds were fraudulently transferred from her accounts to suspicious accounts, and since no FIR was filed and no other claimant appeared despite considerable time passing, the petitioner was entitled to custody of the seized funds. The court ordered the funds released subject to conditions that the petitioner execute a bond and appear when directed, and that claims by other interested parties would require return of the funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 190/2026 The court granted petitioner Kotwal Najma Haji's application under BNS Section 503 to recover ₹61,000 that was seized from her bank accounts following a cyber fraud complaint. The court found that funds were fraudulently transferred from her accounts to suspicious accounts, and since no FIR was filed and no other claimant appeared despite considerable time passing, the petitioner was entitled to custody of the seized funds. The court ordered the funds released subject to conditions that the petitioner execute a bond and appear when directed, and that claims by other interested parties would require return of the funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts