State of Gujarat vs KANTABEN ARVINDBHAI GOHEL — 523/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS020008732026
Filing Number
523/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
523/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
Civil Court, Veraval
Judge
15-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11186009250919
Police Station
VERAVAL POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KANTABEN ARVINDBHAI GOHEL
Hearing History
Judge: 15-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Kantaben Arvindbhai Gohel (523/2026) The accused, Kantaben Arvindbhai Gohel, voluntarily pleaded guilty to charges under Section 67-A of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court, applying the principle that special and adequate reasons justify sentences below the statutory minimum, imposed a lenient sentence considering the accused's financial condition and plea for mercy. The accused was convicted and sentenced to a fine of ₹500 or one day simple imprisonment in default, with confiscated contraband to be destroyed post-appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Kantaben Arvindbhai Gohel (523/2026) The accused, Kantaben Arvindbhai Gohel, voluntarily pleaded guilty to charges under Section 67-A of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court, applying the principle that special and adequate reasons justify sentences below the statutory minimum, imposed a lenient sentence considering the accused's financial condition and plea for mercy. The accused was convicted and sentenced to a fine of ₹500 or one day simple imprisonment in default, with confiscated contraband to be destroyed post-appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts