BARAD SANIBHAI PRATAPBHAI vs State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 189/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATI- JMFC

CNR: GJGS020008712026

Filing Number

189/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

189/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

8-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BARAD SANIBHAI PRATAPBHAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary of Case 189/2026 The court granted petitioner Barad Sanibhai Pratapbhai's application under BNSS Section 503 to recover ₹48,996 seized in a cybercrime fraud case. The court found that funds were fraudulently transferred from the petitioner's bank account to a suspicious account, the cyber police had frozen the amount in HDFC Bank, and no FIR was filed despite significant time passing. The court ordered the frozen amount transferred to petitioner's Axis Bank account upon submission of personal and surety bonds, with conditions that the petitioner produce funds if demanded and return them if another claimant establishes rightful ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 189/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 189/2026 The court granted petitioner Barad Sanibhai Pratapbhai's application under BNSS Section 503 to recover ₹48,996 seized in a cybercrime fraud case. The court found that funds were fraudulently transferred from the petitioner's bank account to a suspicious account, the cyber police had frozen the amount in HDFC Bank, and no FIR was filed despite significant time passing. The court ordered the frozen amount transferred to petitioner's Axis Bank account upon submission of personal and surety bonds, with conditions that the petitioner produce funds if demanded and return them if another claimant establishes rightful ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case