BARAD SANIBHAI PRATAPBHAI vs State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 189/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATI- JMFC
CNR: GJGS020008712026
Filing Number
189/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
189/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
Civil Court, Veraval
Judge
8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BARAD SANIBHAI PRATAPBHAI
Respondent(s)
State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Disposed
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 189/2026 The court granted petitioner Barad Sanibhai Pratapbhai's application under BNSS Section 503 to recover ₹48,996 seized in a cybercrime fraud case. The court found that funds were fraudulently transferred from the petitioner's bank account to a suspicious account, the cyber police had frozen the amount in HDFC Bank, and no FIR was filed despite significant time passing. The court ordered the frozen amount transferred to petitioner's Axis Bank account upon submission of personal and surety bonds, with conditions that the petitioner produce funds if demanded and return them if another claimant establishes rightful ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 189/2026 The court granted petitioner Barad Sanibhai Pratapbhai's application under BNSS Section 503 to recover ₹48,996 seized in a cybercrime fraud case. The court found that funds were fraudulently transferred from the petitioner's bank account to a suspicious account, the cyber police had frozen the amount in HDFC Bank, and no FIR was filed despite significant time passing. The court ordered the frozen amount transferred to petitioner's Axis Bank account upon submission of personal and surety bonds, with conditions that the petitioner produce funds if demanded and return them if another claimant establishes rightful ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts