CHAVDA ABHAY HARIBHAI vs State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 188/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATI- JMFC

CNR: GJGS020008682026

Case disposed

Filing Number

188/2026

Filing Date

13-03-2026

Registration No

188/2026

Registration Date

13-03-2026

Court

Civil Court, Veraval

Judge

8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503

Petitioner(s)

CHAVDA ABHAY HARIBHAI

Respondent(s)

State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 8-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO OPPONENT

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: CRI.M.A. No. 188/2026 The court approved the petitioner Chavda Abhay Haribhai's application under BNS Section 503 for return of frozen funds. The petitioner reported a cyber fraud/financial fraud involving unauthorized bank transfer of ₹27,934 from his ICICI Bank account to a suspicious account, which was subsequently frozen by cyber police under BNS Section 106. The investigating officer supported returning the funds, confirming no FIR was filed and no other claimant challenged the petitioner's ownership. The court ordered release of the seized amount to the petitioner's custody upon furnishing personal and surety bonds, with conditions that he produce the funds before the court if required and return them if any legitimate third-party claim emerges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRI.M.A. No. 188/2026 The court approved the petitioner Chavda Abhay Haribhai's application under BNS Section 503 for return of frozen funds. The petitioner reported a cyber fraud/financial fraud involving unauthorized bank transfer of ₹27,934 from his ICICI Bank account to a suspicious account, which was subsequently frozen by cyber police under BNS Section 106. The investigating officer supported returning the funds, confirming no FIR was filed and no other claimant challenged the petitioner's ownership. The court ordered release of the seized amount to the petitioner's custody upon furnishing personal and surety bonds, with conditions that he produce the funds before the court if required and return them if any legitimate third-party claim emerges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court, Veraval All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case